<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DDI In-Play: The Psion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/07/ddi-in-play-the-psion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/07/ddi-in-play-the-psion/</link>
	<description>Inspired 4e Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:43:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackOfHearts</title>
		<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/07/ddi-in-play-the-psion/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>JackOfHearts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/?p=931#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>I really did mean half - not two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really did mean half &#8211; not two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackOfHearts</title>
		<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/07/ddi-in-play-the-psion/comment-page-1/#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator>JackOfHearts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/?p=931#comment-2287</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Of course, the obvious combination is with rogue, and I think one of my players was interested in making that happen.  I wish they would put out the multiclass rules with it, but understandably, it may not be as simple.  I am thinking about just houseruling that multi-class into Psion gives you a daily use of the Distract power and you can trade an at-will for a psion at will.  You also get two half of the powerpoints you would normally get per encounter to augment the at-will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Of course, the obvious combination is with rogue, and I think one of my players was interested in making that happen.  I wish they would put out the multiclass rules with it, but understandably, it may not be as simple.  I am thinking about just houseruling that multi-class into Psion gives you a daily use of the Distract power and you can trade an at-will for a psion at will.  You also get two half of the powerpoints you would normally get per encounter to augment the at-will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBV</title>
		<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/07/ddi-in-play-the-psion/comment-page-1/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>DBV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/?p=931#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I played a little bit with it, and in practice, the Power Points just fuel you to the level of a normal class (2 Encounter powers at lv 5 is spot on). I feel that the one point augments are less useful at this point, but because the mechanic is the way it is, it opens up design space later on -- look at some of the higher level At-Wills that have Augment 4, for instance. Other than that, I think the At-Wills are better than the Wizard at wills, but very on par with Druid at-wills, so I&#039;d argue against power creep in that regard. My main complaint is that we don&#039;t have the tools to multiclass psionics yet. I&#039;ve always viewed it as a neat &quot;add-on&quot; for a character, since the days of the wild-talent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I played a little bit with it, and in practice, the Power Points just fuel you to the level of a normal class (2 Encounter powers at lv 5 is spot on). I feel that the one point augments are less useful at this point, but because the mechanic is the way it is, it opens up design space later on &#8212; look at some of the higher level At-Wills that have Augment 4, for instance. Other than that, I think the At-Wills are better than the Wizard at wills, but very on par with Druid at-wills, so I&#8217;d argue against power creep in that regard. My main complaint is that we don&#8217;t have the tools to multiclass psionics yet. I&#8217;ve always viewed it as a neat &#8220;add-on&#8221; for a character, since the days of the wild-talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamefiend</title>
		<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/07/ddi-in-play-the-psion/comment-page-1/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>gamefiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/?p=931#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>Nice breakdown of your experience.  Betrayal in proper situations is rough on us poor GMs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice breakdown of your experience.  Betrayal in proper situations is rough on us poor GMs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
