<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHB2 In-Play: The Sorcerer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/06/phb2-in-play-the-sorceror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/06/phb2-in-play-the-sorceror/</link>
	<description>Inspired 4e Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:43:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saragon</title>
		<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/06/phb2-in-play-the-sorceror/comment-page-1/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Saragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/?p=748#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>Marc: Warlocks aren&#039;t exactly underpowered - there are some truly nasty things you can do with them. In a sense, though, they &#039;minor&#039; in the Controller role - they can debuff foes in lots of nasty ways - whereas the sorceror focuses solely on damage, and does that extremely well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc: Warlocks aren&#8217;t exactly underpowered &#8211; there are some truly nasty things you can do with them. In a sense, though, they &#8216;minor&#8217; in the Controller role &#8211; they can debuff foes in lots of nasty ways &#8211; whereas the sorceror focuses solely on damage, and does that extremely well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamefiend</title>
		<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/06/phb2-in-play-the-sorceror/comment-page-1/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>gamefiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/?p=748#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>I think the Warlock/Sorceror contention is really an apples &amp; oranges sort of thing.

For raw damage, I think Sorcerors are the nuts. They are a blaster for sure. Warlocks are great at crippling foes and superior mobility/defense.  

They are both strikers but they do different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Warlock/Sorceror contention is really an apples &amp; oranges sort of thing.</p>
<p>For raw damage, I think Sorcerors are the nuts. They are a blaster for sure. Warlocks are great at crippling foes and superior mobility/defense.  </p>
<p>They are both strikers but they do different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Graysun</title>
		<link>http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/2009/06/phb2-in-play-the-sorceror/comment-page-1/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Graysun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-will.omnivangelist.net/?p=748#comment-1965</guid>
		<description>How do you find they compare to the Warlocks?  The buzz I&#039;m hearing is that the &#039;locks are severely underpowered and one would be much better off playing a sorcerer, or even a wizard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you find they compare to the Warlocks?  The buzz I&#8217;m hearing is that the &#8216;locks are severely underpowered and one would be much better off playing a sorcerer, or even a wizard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
